There are good Solana-safety tools out there, and most are strongest in one area. Cabal-Hunter puts contract safety, wallet-graph coordination and deployer history into one verdict your bot can act on.
Marked from each tool's public API documentation and our own calls to it, 15 Sep 2026. A tool's web app can show more than its API documents.
| Capability | Cabal-Hunter | GoPlus | RugCheck | Sol Tracker | Bubblemaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract safety β the token itself | |||||
| Honeypot Β· freeze Β· Token-2022 | β | β | β | ~ | β |
| Mint authority Β· LP checks | ~ | β | β | ~ | β |
| Who's coordinating behind it | |||||
| Funding-cluster / cabal tracing | β | β | ~ | ~ | β |
| Same-block bundles | β | β | β | β | β |
| Coordinated dump (same block) | β | β | β | β | β |
| Serial-launcher deployer history | β | ~ | ~ | β | β |
| How an agent uses it | |||||
| One verdict + on-chain evidence | β | β | ~ | ~ | β |
| MCP-native Β· no signup | β | ~ | β | β | β |
| Free tier | First paid tier | Signup | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RugCheck | $0 Β· 3 req/sec | $40/mo Β· 10 req/sec | No key for the free tier |
| Bubblemaps | β | $170/mo Β· 100k credits | Account required |
| Cabal-Hunter | 5/mo · 250 with an email | $9/mo Β· 50k | No signup |
Competitor prices as published on their own pages, checked 15 Sep 2026. Check them yourself β that is the point.
RugCheck is a genuinely good tool and covers a lot of the same ground β contract checks, LP lockers, insider networks, a risk score. If it does what you need, use it. We mean that.
The difference is what it costs to run inside a bot, and how many calls it takes. One call returns the whole verdict β contract safety, coordination and deployer history, fused into a single are-you-exit-liquidity answer your agent can act on. $9/month, no account, MCP or REST.
They overlap less than you might expect.
GoPlus, RugCheck, the free MCP checkers. Strongest on the token itself β honeypot, mint/freeze, LP. RugCheck also maps insider networks from token transfers. Neither GoPlus nor RugCheck documents funding-source tracing or same-block dump detection.
Bubblemaps. The mirror image β it owns the map. Its API documents holders, transfers, wallet clusters and a decentralisation score, with no contract-safety checks and no deployer history. It draws the map; you interpret it.
We respect all of these. Here's exactly where we add what they don't.
Best-in-class wallet-cluster visualisation. It's genuinely great.
We add: a verdict a bot can gate on (not a map for a human to read), plus contract-safety checks and deployer launch history that its API does not document β MCP-native, with a free tier.
A large multi-chain contract-security API. Excellent for honeypot and authority checks.
We add: the wallet graph its API does not document β who funded the holders, who bundled the launch, who sold together in the same block β fused with the contract check into one Solana-native verdict.
A widely used Solana token-safety scanner with a free API. Solid holder and authority data.
We add: funding-source tracing, same-block bundles and same-block coordinated dumps, with the transactions behind each wallet cluster in evidence_txs β built for an agent to call, not a human to browse.
A broad token data API with a risk score and bundler, sniper and insider data. Great if you need everything.
We add: funding-source clusters with their proof transactions, and the deployer's launch history β delivered as an MCP tool with a zero-signup free tier, not one field in a bulk feed.
Free, MCP-native Solana honeypot/rug checkers. Good for the contract basics.
We add: the coordination layer β funding clusters, same-block bundles, coordinated dumps and deployer history β the difference between "is the contract safe" and "who's on the other side of this trade."
We're not the deepest at any single row β Bubblemaps draws a richer map, GoPlus has a bigger security DB.
Our edge is the fusion: one pre-trade verdict that combines all three bands, agent-native, with the evidence attached. That is the space we occupy.